Information on Loughborough
News Index
2012
Feb 2012Jan 2012
2011
Dec 2011Nov 2011
Oct 2011
Sep 2011
Aug 2011
Jul 2011
Jun 2011
May 2011
Apr 2011
Mar 2011
Feb 2011
Jan 2011
2010
Dec 2010Nov 2010
Oct 2010
Sep 2010
Aug 2010
Jul 2010
Jun 2010
May 2010
Apr 2010
Mar 2010
Feb 2010
Jan 2010
2009
Dec 2009Nov 2009
Oct 2009
Sep 2009
Aug 2009
Jul 2009
Jun 2009
May 2009
Apr 2009
Mar 2009
Feb 2009
Jan 2009
2008
Dec 2008Nov 2008
Oct 2008
Sep 2008
Aug 2008
Jul 2008
Jun 2008
May 2008
Apr 2008
Mar 2008
Feb 2008
Jan 2008
2007
Dec 2007Nov 2007
Oct 2007
Sep 2007
Aug 2007
Jul 2007
Jun 2007
May 2007
County Hall's Rubbish Indecision Condemned
Posted on 03/11/2009
newsdesk
A report to County Council's Scrutiny committee on the 28^th October confirmed that the County Council is not prepared to rule any waste incineration when seeking tenders for County's waste disposal strategy from 2015. Three companies have been short listed to bid for the contract, Biffa, United Utilities/John Laing & Veolia. Significantly the Council has decided that it will not stipulate any particular form of waste disposal, stating that it 'would take a neutral stance'. This opens the way for the final three contenders to promote waste incineration in preference to the more modern, and environmentally preferable techniques such as autoclave and anaerobic digestion.
However other council's (incuding Leicester City, Gateshead, Rotherham and Tower Hamlets) have insisted that modern cleaner techniques are the only ones that are acceptable. Supporters of autoclaving also point out that modern waste disposal process have far higher recycling rates than incinerators, which need plastics to keep the fires burning.
Opponents of incineration are also sceptical of the claims made in the report that the amount of waste available for use as fuel will continue to rise to 180,000 tons per annum by 2040. They stress that EU directives, and people power are forcing manufacturers to reduce unwanted packaging, and to recycle more. Therefore the County will be forced to import rubbish from surrounding counties to keep the incinerator running.
Another report agreed at the last County Council meeting resolved that 'non strategic waste disposal sites' should be located in the new Sustainable Urban Extensions. Resents of Leicester Forest East and Thurmaston are now concerned that they will be used as 'waste transfer stations' to store rubbish from the Nottinghamshire & Northamptonshire , to ensure a stock pile to fire the anticipated incinerator that will be based at Shepshed. The new Leicester Forest East SUE waste site will have easy access to the M1, and the proposed Thurmaston SUE waste site will provide a stopping off point for Nottinghamshore's waste that will then be transferred to Shepshed on the A6.
Eric Goodyer, who is campaigning for an autoclave process to be chosen, said